Liquidated Damages or a Penalty?

Table of Contents

A trap that contract drafters often fall into is writing a clause that instead of being liquidated damages, crosses the line into a penalty.

In summary the difference is:

  • Liquidated damages: If the amount fixed by the parties is a ‘genuine estimate (or pre-estimate as is commonly written) of the loss by a future breach of the contract, it is liquidated damages.
  • Penalty: On the other hand if the amount fixed by the parties is unreasonable then it is probably a penalty.

A clause for liquidated damages will require one party to pay the other party compensation for a breach of the contract.  The term “liquidated” means the amount of compensation is either designated or can be accurately calculated.

The amount of compensation that a party should be required to pay, should be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss that would result from a breach of the contract in question.

As opposed to being a genuine pre-estimate, a penalty punishes the party by requiring them to pay a sum that is unconscionable or non-proportional to the loss that would have been suffered.

Some key things to assist in the identification of penalties include:

  • the actual effect of the clause rather than the wording of the clause in question;
  • whether the clause is a bona fide pre-estimate of (potential) damages;
  • the construction of the clause in relation to the context of the contract as a whole; and
  • if the payment is of a single amount, whether the amount is proportionate to the breach.

As always expert advice should be sought if you are signing a contract with liquidated damages, or if you are drafting one.

Related Articles

Megs D
Megs D
Google Review
Read More
David was INSTRUMENTAL in helping me launch a new business quickly and properly. He looked at the information I had put together, talked through what I needed and why it was important, and worked with me to get the right solution sorted quickly (unlike the previous company I had been dealing with who dragged things on for weeks and then just tried to sell me what they had rather than listen to/understand what I was after). VERY impressed with the quick turnaround and have no hesitation recommending him to others. Will definitely use his services for future projects.
Arek Rainczuk
Arek Rainczuk
Google Review
Read More
I engaged David to draw up contracts for my agency. He took the time to learn about my specific needs, proposed valuable clauses and delivered in a timely manner. David is very experienced and easy to work with, now I have the peace of mind to focus on what I do best.
Previous
Next

Share this page

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit